Chris Hedges stated in an essay this week, that “in every
conflict, insurgency, uprising and revolution I have covered as a foreign
correspondent, the power elite used periods of dormancy, lulls and setbacks to
write off the opposition” (Hedges). I hope that he is right, and that the
excitement of 2011 mission to occupy and challenge corporate-financial control
was not just a fling.
At a vigil the week of June 18 in New York City, a slim
fifty progressives appeared in Washington Square Park. For me, it was a
disappointment. It was a W.O.W (women of occupy wall street) session/general
assembly. Now when I saw members of this group last March at the Left Forum I
was excited about the edge the women had. However, when I went last Monday to
Washington Square Park, none of the women from the panel at the Forum were
there. Instead it was only a small 50 people and the activists there that I had
been grouped in a discussion with flattened the edge. Rather than solidarity,
they made me feel that I had to defend my voice.
The skepticism toward silent straight men at the vigil made
them want me to prove myself to them. Not a healthy chemistry. I tried my best
to appeal to their cynicism to not cancel out those who reflect an image they
are use to being hostile against. They made themselves appear hypocritical and
wounded. I hope that the movement learns to grow. The Occupy Movement almost
feels dead and atrophied. So many have branched out into different less visible
outlets.
So I sought some additional enlightenment. On an earlier
Monday, June 11, 2012 the Nobel Laureate Jody Williams made a commencement
speech in northern Spain at the Cantabria International Campus (I caught it on
the internet). In her speech, she mentions that “People Need to De-militarize
how they think” and this is essential to stop a closed-minded violent world.
Disarmament can only happen when we educate the youth about the value of
nonviolence (Williams). Jody
Williams’ passion is always an inspiring antidote to keep me moving forward. But
how can I bring her ‘demilitarized mind’ to my experience of a possibly dilapidated
social movement?
Albert Einstein, highly debunked and depressed after
realizing that the knowledge he had, couldn’t foresee the doom of his atomic
discoveries from energy to weapons made a moral observation. He stated: A human being is a part of the whole called
by us ‘the universe,’ a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself,
his thoughts and feelings, as something separate from the rest – a kind of
optical delusion of consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us,
restricting us to our personal desires and affection for a few persons nearest
to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening the
circle of understanding (Einstein). Freeing ourselves from our violent reactive visual prison is
our responsibility and not that of the opposition. We have to learn to begin to
see better than we have done in the past.
In all HONESTY and the experience I had at the vigil on
Monday June 18, 2012 was in part the continual backlash of progressive and
protest frustration of many women and minorities with the Occupy Wall Street’s
greater failure of going beyond dominant white straight male supremacy, even in
the movement that claims to challenge the system. The greater Occupy falls ill
to the same limits it protests, and the more selective protests have a harder time
escaping ripple effects of discomfort with those who represent the status
quo. How can we slip out from this
cycle effect?
Chandra Mohanty and Cherrie Moraga are two prominent
intellectual activists who dwell on the idea of ‘home’. Mohanty, originally
from India, states that ‘Being-Home’ refers to a place where one lives within familiar, safe, protected boundaries; ‘Not being
home’ is a matter of realizing that home was an illusion of coherence and
safety based on the exclusion of specific histories of oppression and
resistance, the repression of differences even within one self (Mohanty, Feminism Without Borders).
The location and function of one’s location acquires meaning
when individuals assume a particular, singularly fixed essential bounded fortress
as Mohanty suggests, and this leads to false limited horizons (from limits in
conventionality, to limits in race and gender relations, to limits in ideology).
In a reflection on Gloria Anzaldua in her book A Xicana Codex of Changing Consciousness, Moraga sheds that
“Anzaldua felt that she had to leave ‘home’ because its cultural restraints
would have killed her – body and spirit (in more ways than one). Freedom
resided elsewhere” (Moraga). On the contrary, Moraga suggests the opposite.
The Chicano activist and theorist strategized that “what I have come to believe through my
political and spiritual practice is that as marginalized peoples, we all have
to make our way back into the ‘home’ sites that have rejected and deformed us
in order to reform them (Moraga).
Moraga pushes the notion that all marginalized voices must go back to
the home and wreck house in order to make the heads-of-the-households know that
they are not the sole voice. Given the opportunity that is self-created, a
mosquito will enter the house, and will make itself present.
Mohanty agrees with Moraga when she states, “Home - is a
warning to all feminists that ‘we are going to have to break out of the little
barred rooms” and cease holding tenaciously to the invisible. All activists
female and male need to “break down the subject-object duality that keeps her
prisoner and to show in the flesh, through the images in her work and actions,
how duality is transcended” (Mohanty). Not all women are feminists, and not all feminists are women.
Change must come from the bottom up. Mohanty and Moraga
remind us that feminism and masculine-ism from wealthy standpoints of those who
have the luxury to speak out do not bring sufficient voice to represent the
misrepresented, the poor, the homeless, and the minority positions. These
voices have been excluded due to ‘cognitive dimensional constituted permissible
thinking’ and inferring of inferiority. For example, just last week the Spanish
Prime Minister used insulting apathy and indifference to his reference that
Spain deserved a worthy bailout from the European Union because they weren’t
‘Uganda’. Such blind statements that ignore historic imperialism and
colonialism reflect how out of touch certain classes of luxury shed no
responsible steps of inclusion.
A debilitating generality is the callous act of movement
failure, whether it is a protest, problem solving, or a social network; the
object-status limits higher grip over significant yields.
Cherrie Moraga encourages us to question, “How do we
remember rupture beyond what we have been schooled to imagine?” and she alludes
to the activist/novelist Toni Cade Bambara’s push “Can you afford to be whole?”
In the anthology African
Women Writing Resistance, Adesola Mafe states: “Resistance - has generally
meant ‘non-compliance’ to me. I know that my non-compliance is not always
immediate, not always self-evident, and not always strong enough … but Audre
Lorde warns us that ‘Your Silence will not protect you’” (Mafe).
Nawal El Saadawi acknowledges the silence, “Scared people
are easy to control”. It is patriotism
that protects us from the deeper, harder complicity. In that light,
“terrorism will never be defeated by big guns”, and Jody Williams and Albert
Einstein have been aware of this. Part of the means to ‘demilitarize the mind’
would be to “Be Among”. Chandra Mohanty explains, to ‘be among’ is to “choose
to participate in defining the terms of one’s own existence,” she quotes a
Filipina factory worker, “because the only way to get a little measure of power
over your own life is to do it collectively, with the support of other people
who share your needs” (Mohanty). We as activists must “Undo ingrained”
trajectories of image and identity bias based social movements: Throwing yourself into the next century, we
take ourselves seriously only when we go ‘beyond ourselves’ (Mohanty).
Richard Wolin states, in his 1992 analysis Terms of Cultural Criticism, “Specify
very carefully what type of utopia one intends”. By going beyond our selves and pushing past our visual
barriers, will be the only way to break down the cycle. In some ways, we have
to admire and embrace Helen Keller. Her insight was deeper than our limitations
and our senses. She learned to see and hear though she was blind and deaf. She
learned to read as her teacher taught her through her sense of touch. She
opposed war and she utilized her ability to think. If need be, cover your eyes
and shield your ears, just feel intuitively where the inclusivity is most
evident.
Scattered thoughts in multiple directions, I lose my
audience as I reflect on the thoughts that double speak through me. Walter
Benjamin said that there are limits and fear when a ‘meaningless emancipation’
leads to a human race with no cognitive self, no sense of purpose and need to
exert identity, or to have an adverse obstacle to overcome. The fear of
nihilism is a shallow accord; once activists find a cause to fight for we must
not lose the meaning in the limits of our image.
No comments:
Post a Comment